Everything here is advisory: indicators to review, never a verdict — you decide. A flagged requirement means “worth a second look”, never “obsolete”.
What the comparison shows
- The set delta — user stories added, removed and common between the two plans.
- Drift candidates — common stories that changed after the baseline’s reference execution (the latest run of the baseline plan), with which field moved.
- The comparison works on the rendered text of the substance fields (title, description, acceptance criteria by default — configurable at project level): an HTML reformat, a bold or an invisible typo is never a drift. A fast mode (off by default) skips the text diff and compares dates only.
Stale coverage
The drift screen also carries a “Stale coverage” section: the requirements that were modified strictly after the last execution of their linked tests. Their green results are formally correct — and prove nothing anymore.- A conditional counter says it plainly: “N Passed no longer prove anything”. Zero stale requirements? The section folds into a neutral “all up to date” — zero gaps, zero noise.
- Each flagged requirement shows its status (Stale — to re-test) and the nature of the change — acceptance criteria, description or title, in that order of significance — resolved lazily, only for the flagged ones.
- Filter chips with counters let you slice the list, and a project option can ignore title-only changes.
- Modifying a requirement on the same instant as the last run is not stale, and a requirement whose runs carry no date is never flagged — the signal errs on the side of silence.
Read-only, as always
The drift analysis reads work item history through the permissions the extension already has — no new scope, nothing written, and the baseline is implicit (the latest execution date of the baseline plan): no baseline is ever stored.Related
Test coverage on the work item
Where the stale badge appears.
Coverage depth
Is it covered — and covered well?